A Crumple Resistant Security Sheet, A Method Of Manufacturing Such A Sheet, And A Security Document Including Such A Sheet


Updated about 2 years ago

Abstract

The present invention relates to a crumple-resistant security sheet comprising:• fibers;• an anionic polymer in a proportion lying in the range 5% to 45% by dry weightrelative to the total dry weight of the fibers, and presenting a glass transition temperaturegreater than -40°C; and• a main cationic flocculation agent in a quantity lying in the range 1% to 5% by dryweight relative to the total dry weight of the fibers.

Information

Application ID 4104/KOLNP/2009
Invention Field TEXTILE
Date of Application 2009-11-26
Publication Number 11/2010

Applicants

Name Address Country Nationality
ARJOWIGGINS SECURITY 21/23 BOULEVARD HAUSSMANN, 75009 PARIS, FRANCE France France

Inventors

Name Address Country Nationality
ROSSET, HENRI 66 ALLÉE DE LA COMBE CHATTE, F-38730 LE PIN - FRANCE France France

Specification

The invention relates to a security sheet that is resistant to crumpling, to a method
of manufacturing such a sheet, and to a security document including such a sheet.
Currently, numerous security documents, such as banknotes or identity documents,
comprise paper media. A drawback of the paper media that are used is that they offer poor
resistance to crumpling. Thus, the crumpled zones present deep and irreversible creases or
folds that offer poor resistance to soiling, so that the crumpled zones are weakened and
often give rise to tears. That is a particularly major drawback for documents which, on
being handled, are frequently creased, folded, or crumpled, such as, for example,
banknotes, with the presence of creases or folds weakening them and shortening their
lifetimes, and making it difficult for them to be handled in automated manner, e.g. when
checking authenticity or wear on sorting machines.
An object of the invention is thus to provide a security sheet that offers good
resistance to crumpling.
The Applicant has found that this object is achieved by providing a crumple-
resistant security sheet comprising: fibers; an anionic polymer in a proportion lying in the
range 5% to 45% by dry weight relative to the total dry weight of the fibers, and presenting
a glass transition temperature greater than -40°C; and a main cationic flocculation agent in
a quantity lying in the range 1% to 5% by dry weight relative to the total dry weight of the
fibers.
In the present application, the expression "total weight of the fibers" should be
understood as meaning "total dry weight of the fibers", unless otherwise indicated.
The term "anionic polymer" is used herein to mean a polymer having anionic
groups. This polymer has been used in the form of a stabilized dispersion or emulsion in
an aqueous medium, such a dispersion or emulsion also being known as a "latex".
Polymers in aqueous dispersion are in common use and are known to the person skilled in
the art of the paper-making industry.
In order to assess the resistance to crumpling of the security sheet, Bendtsen
porosity measurements were taken before and after crumpling. Due to the creases or folds
formed, the crumpling operation degrades the surface of the paper in more or less
pronounced manner, giving rise to an increase in its porosity and thus in its weakness. By
comparing the values for the porosity of the paper before and after crumpling, it is thus

possible to assess the resistance to crumpling of said paper. The less the increase in the
porosity between the initial sheet and the crumpled sheet is marked, the more the paper is
resistant to crumpling. The object is thus to obtain post-crumpling porosity values that are
as low as possible.
In an embodiment of the invention, said sheet further comprises a secondary
cationic flocculation agent in a quantity lying in the range 0.001% to 0.006% by dry
weight relative to the total weight of the fibers. This embodiment is particularly
advantageous when the proportion of the anionic polymer is high, in particular when it
exceeds 20% by dry weight relative to the total weight of the fibers, because the presence
of the secondary cationic flocculation agent makes it possible to improve the flocculation
of the anionic polymer.
The Applicant has found that the presence of an anionic polymer and of
flocculation agent(s) in the composition of the sheet of the invention makes it possible to
improve significantly the crumple resistance of said sheet. Thus, the sheet of the invention
can present a post-crumpling porosity close to the porosity of a non-crumpled sheet, i.e.
the creases or folds caused by the crumpling hardly weaken the paper at all. This
characteristic enables the security sheet of the invention to have a very long circulation
lifetime.
The sheet of the invention also presents very high "double-folding" endurance.
In addition, the sheet of the invention presents tear strength equivalent to or greater
than the tear strength of a sheet not including anionic polymer.
During the experiments that it has conducted, the Applicant has found that only
those sheets including anionic polymers having glass transition temperatures greater than
-40°C had excellent crumple-resistance characteristics. The Applicant found that anionic
polymers having glass transition temperatures lower than -40°C were too "soft" for use in
a security sheet, and led to sheets having mechanical properties, such as traction strength,
tear strength, or dry or wet bursting strength that were degraded.
In a particular embodiment of the invention, said anionic polymer presents a glass
transition temperature lying in the range -30°C to 10°C.
The term "glass transition temperature" is used to mean the temperature below
which the polymer is rigid. When the temperature increases, the polymer goes through a

transition state that enables the macromolecular chains to slide relative to one another, and
the polymer softens.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the proportion of said anionic polymer
lies in the range 10% to 30% by dry weight relative to the total weight of the fibers.
In an embodiment of the invention, the fibers included in the composition of the
sheet comprise cellulose fibers, in particular cotton fibers.
In particular, said cellulose fibers are present in a proportion greater than 60% by
dry weight relative to the total dry weight of the composition of said sheet.
In a particular embodiment of the invention, said cellulose fibers represent at least
70% by dry weight of the total quantity of fibers.
In particular, said cellulose fibers are cotton fibers and they represent at least 70%
by dry weight of the total quantity of fibers.
Preferably, in another embodiment of the invention, the fibers included in the
composition of the sheet may comprise synthetic fibers. This embodiment is particularly
advantageous because it makes it possible to improve further the tear strength properties of
the sheet of the invention. During its research, the Applicant has found that, surprisingly,
the use of synthetic fibers that are generally used to reinforce paper, had a synergistic
effect with the use of the anionic polymer. By measurement, the Applicant has found that
the sheets containing synthetic fibers, while continuing to have high crumple resistance,
also have particularly high tear strength. The tear strength of the sheets in this particular
embodiment of the invention was found to be higher than the tear strength of the sheets of
the invention that do not include synthetic fibers, and higher than the tear strength of
sheets that include synthetic fibers but not anionic polymer.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the synthetic fibers are in a quantity
lying in the range 5% to 30% by dry weight relative to the total weight of the fibers.
In a particular embodiment of the invention, the sheet includes cotton fibers in a
proportion of at least 70% by dry weight relative to the total weight of the fibers, and
synthetic fibers in a proportion lying in the range 10% to 30% by dry weight relative to the
total weight of the fibers, the sum total of the cotton fibers and of the synthetic fibers being
equal to 100%.

In particular, the security sheets of the invention that include synthetic fibers
present tear strength greater than 1300mN.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, said synthetic fibers are chosen from
among polyamide fibers and/or polyester fibers. For example, they can be polyamide 6-6
fibers or polyester fibers sold by Kuraray under the trade name EP133.
In an embodiment of the invention, the anionic polymer present in the security
sheet comprises a polymer presenting carboxyl functions. In particular, said polymer is a
carboxylated styrene butadiene copolymer. Such copolymers are available, for example,
from Dow Chemical Company with various glass transition temperatures.
In an embodiment of the invention, the main cationic flocculation agent is a
cationic resin. In particular, said cationic resin is a polyamide-amine-epichlorohydrin
(PAAE) resin.
In another embodiment of the invention, the main cationic flocculation agent is
chosen from polyacryiamides, polyethyleneimines, polyvinylamines, and mixtures thereof.
In an embodiment of the invention, the secondary cationic flocculation agent is
chosen from polyacryiamides, polyethyleneimines, polyvinylamines, and mixtures thereof.
In an embodiment of the invention, the security sheet includes at least one security
element.
In particular, said security element is chosen from optically variable devices
(OVDs), in particular elements presenting interference effects and particularly iridescent
elements, holograms, security threads, watermarks, planchet spots, pigments or fibers that
are luminescent and/or iridescent and/or magnetic and/or metallic, and combinations
thereof.
In addition, the sheet of the invention may include a radiofrequency identification
(RFID) device.
In another embodiment of the invention, the security sheet of the invention
includes at least one zone that is at least partially free of fibers, which zone is referred to as
a "window".

In another embodiment, the security sheet of the invention includes a security
thread or strip incorporated into said sheet and appearing in at least one window.
In an embodiment of the invention, the security sheet includes mineral fillers in a
quantity lying in the range 1% to 10% by dry weight relative to the total weight of the
fibers. In particular, said mineral fillers are present in a proportion lying in the range 1%
to 5% by dry weight relative to the total weight of the fibers. Such fillers are chosen, for
example, from calcium carbonate, kaolin, titanium dioxide, and mixtures thereof.
In another embodiment of the invention, the security sheet may further comprise an
outer coating layer. Such coating layers, coating at least one face of a sheet, are well
known to the person skilled in the art, and make it possible, for example when the layer is
based on a polyvinyl alcohol, to improve the double-folding endurance and the traction
strength of the sheet. In another example, the security sheet of the invention may further
comprise a coating layer designed to reinforce its durability properties, such as, for
example, a layer whose composition is described in Patent Application EP 1 319 104 and
that comprises a transparent or translucent elastomer binder, such as polyurethane, and a
colloidal silica.
The invention also provides a method of manufacturing the above-described
security sheet.
According to the invention, the manufacturing method comprises the steps
consisting in forming said sheet by a wet-process technique from an aqueous suspension
containing:
• fibers;
• a stabilized aqueous dispersion (latex) of an anionic polymer in a proportion lying
in the range 5% to 45% by dry weight relative to the total weight of the fibers, and
presenting a glass transition temperature greater than -40°C; and
• a main cationic flocculation agent in a quantity lying in the range 1% to 5% by dry
weight relative to the total weight of the fibers;
and then in drying said sheet.

In an implementation of the invention, said aqueous suspension further contains a
secondary cationic flocculation agent in a quantity lying in the range 0.001% to 0.006% by
dry weight relative to the total weight of the fibers.
By using an anionic polymer and flocculation agents, the method of the invention
makes it possible to cause said anionic polymer to precipitate onto the fibers and to obtain
a security sheet that presents crumple-resistance properties that are particularly high.
In a particular implementation of the invention, said aqueous suspension is
obtained from a mixture of fibers and of said main cationic flocculation agent, to which
mixture said anionic polymer and said secondary cationic flocculation agent are added
before proceeding to form said sheet. This implementation offers the advantage of being
applicable to "standard" fiber aqueous suspensions used for manufacturing security sheets
because they include wet strength agents that can also be used as main flocculation agents
in the context of the present invention.
In a particular implementation of the method, said anionic polymer is added before
said secondary flocculation agent.
In an implementation of the invention, said anionic polymer presents a glass
transition temperature lying in the range -30°C to 10°C.
In an implementation of the invention, the method of manufacturing the security
sheet further comprises a step in which, after said suspension has been drained off, at least
one face of said sheet is coated with a coating layer. Said coating layer can make it
possible, for example, to improve the folding endurance and/or traction strength
properties, or indeed the durability properties of said sheet, as described above.
The invention also provides a security document including the security sheet as
described above or as obtained by the above-described method.
In particular, the invention provides a banknote.
The invention is described in more detail below by means of the following non-
limiting examples and comparative examples.

The Applicant performed three series of tests: Series 1 and 2 were conducted on
non-coated sheets, and Series 3 were conducted on sheets each coated with a coating layer,
as generally applies to sheets included in security documents such as banknotes.
Measurements of pre-crumpling porosity and of post-crumpling porosity, of
folding endurance (i.e. resistance to double-folding), and of tear strength were taken on the
resulting sheets.
Series 1
Comparative Example 1
A security sheet was made whose composition corresponded to the basic
composition of a large number of banknotes currently in circulation.
For this purpose, said sheet was formed by a wet-process technique on a cylinder-
mold paper-making machine, from an aqueous suspension containing only cotton fibers
and a wet strength agent (a PAAE resin in this example) in a proportion of 2.1% by dry
weight relative to the weight of the fibers.
The resulting sheet presented a weight expressed in grams per square meter of 85.2
g/m2, and thickness of 142 micrometers (urn).
Example 2
On a cylinder-mold paper-making machine, a sheet of the invention was made that
comprised only cotton fibers, a carboxylated styrene butadiene copolymer having a glass
transition temperature of-25°C in a proportion of 11% by dry weight relative to the weight
of the fibers, and a main flocculation agent in the form of a PAAE resin in a proportion of
2.3% by dry weight relative to the total weight of the fibers. The PAAE resin also acted as
a wet strength agent, as in Comparative Example 1.
The resulting sheet presented a weight of 87.6 g/m2, and a thickness of 124 µm

Example 3
A sheet of paper of the invention was made by using the composition of Example 2
and by adding thereto a polyacrylamide as a secondary flocculation agent in a proportion
of 0.001% relative to the total weight of the fibers.
The resulting sheet presented a weight of 86.9 g/m2 and a thickness of 125 urn.
Example 4
A sheet of paper of the invention was made that comprised the same ingredients as
in Example 3, the anionic polymer being present in a proportion of 25% by dry weight
relative to the weight of the fibers, the main flocculation agent being present in a
proportion of 2.6% by dry weight relative to the total weight of the fibers, and the
secondary cationic flocculation agent being present in a proportion of 0.004% by dry
weight relative to the total weight of the fibers.
The resulting sheet presented a weight of 86.5 g/m2 and a thickness of 121 µm.
Series 2
Comparative Example 5
A security sheet was made whose composition corresponded to the basic
composition of a large number of banknotes currently in circulation.
For this purpose, said sheet was formed by a wet-process technique on a laboratory
handsheet former, from an aqueous suspension containing only cotton fibers and a wet
strength agent (a PAAE resin in this example) in a proportion of 2.5% by dry weight
relative to the total weight of the fibers.
The resulting sheet presented a weight of 80.5 g/m2, and thickness of 137 µm.
Example 6
On a laboratory handsheet former, a sheet of paper of the invention was made that
comprised only cotton fibers, a carboxylated styrene butadiene copolymer having a glass
transition temperature of 5°C in a proportion of 25% by dry weight relative to the total

weight of the fibers, a PAAE resin as a main tlocculation agent (also acting as a wet
strength agent) in a proportion of 3.1% by dry weight relative to the total weight of the
fibers, and a polyacrylamide as a secondary flocculation agent in a proportion of 0.003%
by dry weight relative to the total weight of the fibers.
The resulting sheet presented a weight of 82.7 g/m2, and a thickness of 132 µm.
Example 7
On a laboratory handsheet former, a sheet of paper of the invention was made that
comprised only cotton fibers, a carboxylated styrene butadiene copolymer having a glass
transition temperature of 5°C in a proportion of 11% by dry weight relative to the total
weight of the fibers, a PAAE resin as a main flocculation agent (also acting as a wet
strength agent) in a proportion of 2.8% by dry weight relative to the total weight of the
fibers, and a polyacrylamide as a secondary flocculation agent in a proportion of 0.002%
by dry weight relative to the total weight of the fibers.
The resulting sheet presented a weight of 83.4 g/m2, and a thickness of 136 µm.
Series 3
Comparative Example 8
A sheet was formed by a wet process technique on a cylinder-mold paper-making
machine, from an aqueous suspension of only cotton fibers that also contained a wet
strength agent (PAAE resin) in a proportion of 2.1% by dry weight relative to the total
weight of the fibers. After being formed, the resulting sheet of paper was coated with a
coating layer designed to improve the durability of the sheet, and comprising a
polyurethane binder and a colloidal silica, as described in Application EP 1 319 104.
The resulting sheet presented a weight of 85.8 g/m2, and a thickness of 97 µm.
Comparative Example 9
A security sheet was made that comprised the same ingredients as in Comparative
Example 8, but in which a fraction of the cotton fibers was replaced with polyamide fibers
so that the proportion of cotton fibers was 85% by dry weight and the proportion of
polyamide fibers was 15% by dry weight relative to the total dry weight of the fibers.

Example 10
On a cylinder-mold paper-making machine, a sheet of paper of the invention was
made that comprised only cotton fibers, a carboxylated styrene butadiene copolymer
having a glass transition temperature of-26°C in a proportion of 11% by dry weight
relative to the total dry weight of the fibers, and a PAAE resin as a main flocculation agent
(also acting as a wet strength agent) in a proportion of 2.3% by dry weight relative to the
total dry weight of the fibers.
The resulting sheet presented a weight of 92.8 g/m2, and a thickness of 103 urn.
Example 11
On a cylinder-mold paper-making machine, a sheet of paper of the invention was
made that comprised only cotton fibers, a carboxylated styrene butadiene copolymer
having a glass transition temperature of-26°C in a quantity of 11% by dry weight relative
to the total weight of the fibers, a PAAE resin as a main flocculation agent in a proportion
of 2.1% by dry weight relative to the total weight of the fibers, and a polyacrylamide as a
secondary flocculation agent in a proportion of 0.001% by dry weight relative to the total
dry weight of the fibers.
The resulting sheet presented a weight of 86.9 g/m2, and a thickness of 100 µm.
Example 12
On a cylinder-mold paper-making machine, a sheet of paper of the invention was
made that comprised only cotton fibers, a carboxylated styrene butadiene copolymer
having a glass transition temperature of-26°C in a quantity of 25% by dry weight relative
to the total dry weight of the fibers, a PAAE resin as a main flocculation agent (also acting
as a wet strength agent) in a quantity of 2.6% by dry weight relative to the total dry weight
of the fibers, and a polyacrylamide as a secondary flocculation agent in a proportion of
0.004% by dry weight relative to the total dry weight of the fibers.
The resulting sheet presented a weight of 82.9 g/m2, and a thickness of 95 µm.
Example 13

On a cylinder-mold paper-making machine, a sheet of paper of the invention was
made by using the composition of Example 12, but by replacing a fraction of the cotton
fibers with polyamide fibers so that the proportion of polyamide fibers was 15% by weight
relative to the total dry weight of the fibers.
The resulting sheet presented a weight of 85.4 g/m2 , and a thickness of 108 µm.
Tests and Results
The measurements of porosity before and after crumpling (sheet crumpled eight
times for each test) were taken in compliance with French Standard NF Q03-076. The
crumpling was performed by an "NBS Crumpling Device" of the IGT brand.
The folding endurance measurements were performed in compliance with
International Standard ISO 5626.
The tear strength measures were performed in compliance with European Standard
EN 21974.
In order to evaluate wet resistance, bursting strength was measured in compliance
with French Standard NF Q03-053, on wet and dry sheets. The wet strength value was
then obtained using the following formula:



Series 1
A shown in Table 1 which gives the results of Series 1, the security sheets of
Examples 2 to 4 present post-crumpling porosities that are considerably improved relative
to Comparative Example 1 which is taken as the reference (reduction in post-crumpling
porosity by in the range 28% to 56%).
In the same way, for the sheets of the invention, the double-folding endurance is
considerably increased relative to the sheet of Comparative Example 1 (increase lying in
the range 16% to 53%).
Finally, it should be noted that the sheets of Examples 2 to 4 of the invention
present wet strength values that are very close to and even slightly greater than the wet
strength value of Comparative Example 1, thereby showing that the flocculation agent
used (PAAE resin) continues to act as effectively as a wet strength agent.
Series 2
As shown in Table 2 which gives the results of Series 2, the sheets of Examples 6
and 7 of the invention present post-crumpling porosities that are considerably improved
relative to Comparative Example 5 which is taken as the reference (reduction of in the
range 17% to 48% of the post-crumpling porosity).
In the same manner, for the sheets of the invention, the double-folding endurance is
considerably increased relative to the sheet of Comparative Example 5 which is taken as
the reference (increase lying in the range 87% to 122%).
Series 3
As shown in Table 3 which is recapitulative of the results of Series 3, the security
sheets of Comparative Examples 8 and 9 and of the various examples 10 to 13 present pre-
crumpling porosities that are substantially zero, unlike the sheets of Series 1 and 2. This
can be explained by the presence of a coating layer that "blocks off' the pores at the
surface of the sheets.

After crumpling, all of the sheets of the examples present porosities less than the
porosity of Comparative Example 8. The rate of improvement relative to Comparative
Example 8 which is taken as the reference varies in the range 77% to 88%. The post-
crumpling porosities of the sheets of the invention are very close to the pre-crumpling
porosity of the comparative example 8.
As regards double-folding endurance, the sheets of the invention of Examples 10 to
13 present improvements lying in the range 27% to 186% relative to the sheet not
including anionic polymer of Comparative Example 8 which is taken as the reference.
As regards tear strength, Examples 10 to 13 were compared with Comparative
Example 9 in order to determine the synergy between the presence of synthetic fibers and
the presence of an anionic polymer.
The sheet of Comparative Example 9 does not contain any anionic polymer but it
does contain polyamide fibers in a proportion of 15%. The tear strength of the sheet of
Comparative Example 8 is 13% less than the tear strength of the sheet of Comparative
Example 2, which confirms the effect of the synthetic fibers.
Examples 10 to 12 present tear strength values that are less than or equal to those
of Comparative Example 8, and less than those of Comparative Example 9, i.e. the
presence of an anionic polymer alone has no beneficial influence on tear strength.
Example 13 presents a tear strength value greater than that of Comparative
Example 8 but also significantly greater (+59%) than that of Comparative Example 9.
Therefore, the combination of the presence of synthetic fibers and of the presence of an
anionic polymer in the composition of the security sheet has a synergistic effect on the tear
strength of said sheet.
Finally, it should be noted that the sheets of Examples 10 to 13 of the invention
present wet strength values very close to and even slightly greater than the wet strength
value of Comparative Example 8, which shows that the flocculation agent used (PAAE
resin) continues to act as effectively as a wet strength agent.

WE CLAIM :
1. A crumple-resistant security sheet comprising:
• fibers;
• an anionic polymer in a proportion lying in the range 5% to 45% by dry weight
relative to the total dry weight of the fibers, and presenting a glass transition temperature
greater than -40°C; and
• a main cationic flocculation agent in a quantity lying in the range 1% to 5% by dry
weight relative to the total dry weight of the fibers.

2. A security sheet according to the preceding claim, characterized by the fact that said
sheet further comprises a secondary cationic flocculation agent in a quantity lying in the
range 0.001% to 0.006% by dry weight relative to the total dry weight of the fibers.
3. A security sheet according to any preceding claim, characterized by the fact that said
anionic polymer presents a glass transition temperature lying in the range -30°C to 10°C.
4. A security sheet according to any preceding claim, characterized by the fact that the
proportion of said anionic polymer lies in the range 10% to 30% by dry weight relative to
the dry weight of the fibers.
5. A security sheet according to any preceding claim, characterized by the fact that said
fibers comprise cellulose fibers, in particular cotton fibers.
6. A security sheet according to the preceding claim, characterized by the fact that said
cellulose fibers are present in a proportion greater than 60% by dry weight relative to the
total dry weight of the composition of said sheet.
7. A security sheet according to any preceding claim, characterized by the fact that said
fibers comprise synthetic fibers.
8. A security sheet according to any preceding claim, characterized by the fact that said
synthetic fibers are in a quantity lying in the range 5% to 30% relative to the total dry
weight of the fibers.
9. A security sheet according to claim 7 or claim 8, characterized by the fact that said
synthetic fibers are chosen from among polyamide fibers and/or polyester fibers.

10. A security sheet according to any preceding claim, characterized by the fact that said
anionic polymer comprises a polymer presenting carboxyl functions.
11. A security sheet according to any one of claims 7 to 10, characterized by the fact that
said sheet presents tear strength greater than 1300 mN.
12. A security sheet according to the preceding claim, characterized by the fact that said
anionic polymer comprises a carboxylated styrene butadiene copolymer.
13. A security sheet according to any preceding claim, characterized by the fact that said
main cationic flocculation agent is a cationic resin.
14. A security sheet according to the preceding claim, characterized by the fact that said
cationic resin is a polyamide-amine-epichlorohydrin (PAAE) resin.
15. A security sheet according to any one of claims 1 to 12, characterized by the fact that
said main cationic flocculation agent is chosen from polyacrylamides, polyethyleneimines,
polyvinylamines, and mixtures thereof.
16. A security sheet according to any one of claims 2 to 15, characterized by the fact that
said secondary cationic flocculation agent is chosen from polyacrylamides,
polyethyleneimines, polyvinylamines, and mixtures thereof.
17. A security sheet according to any preceding claim, characterized by the fact that said
sheet includes at least one security element.
18. A security sheet according to the preceding claim, characterized by the fact that said
security element is chosen from optically variable devices (OVDs), in particular elements
presenting interference effects and particularly iridescent elements, holograms, security
threads, watermarks, planchet spots, pigments or fibers that are luminescent and/or
iridescent and/or magnetic and/or metallic, and combinations thereof.
19. A security sheet according to any preceding claim, characterized by the fact that said
sheet includes a radiofrequency identification (RFID) device.
20. A security sheet according to any preceding claim, characterized by the fact that said
sheet includes at least one zone that is at least partially free of fibers.

21. A security sheet according to any preceding claim, characterized by the fact that said
sheet includes mineral fillers in a quantity lying in the range 1% to 10% by dry weight
relative to the total dry weight of the fibers.
22. A security sheet according to any preceding claim, characterized by the fact that said
sheet further comprises an outer coating layer.
23. A security sheet according to the preceding claim, characterized by the fact that said
outer layer comprises a polyurethane binder and a colloidal silica.
24. A method of manufacturing a security sheet such as described in the preceding claims,
said method comprising the steps consisting in forming said sheet by a wet-process
technique from an aqueous suspension containing:

• fibers;
• a stabilized aqueous dispersion of an anionic polymer in a proportion lying in the
range 5% to 45% by dry weight relative to the total dry weight of the fibers, and presenting
a glass transition temperature greater than -40°C; and
• a cationic flocculation agent in a quantity lying in the range 1% to 5% by dry
weight relative to the total dry weight of the fibers;
and then in drying said sheet.
25. A method according to the preceding claim, characterized by the fact that said aqueous
suspension further contains a secondary cationic flocculation agent in a quantity lying in
the range 0.001% to 0.006% by dry weight relative to the total dry weight of the fibers.
26. A manufacturing method according to the preceding claim, characterized by the fact
that said anionic polymer presents a glass transition temperature lying in the range -30°C
to 10°C.
27. A manufacturing method according to any one of claims 24 to 26, characterized by the
fact that a coating layer is applied to at least one face of said security sheet.
28. A security document characterized by the fact that it includes a security sheet as
described in any one of claims 1 to 23 or obtained using the method as defined according
to any one of claims 24 to 27.

29. A security document according to the preceding claim, characterized by the fact that
said document is a banknote.

The present invention relates to a crumple-resistant security sheet comprising:
• fibers;
• an anionic polymer in a proportion lying in the range 5% to 45% by dry weight
relative to the total dry weight of the fibers, and presenting a glass transition temperature
greater than -40°C; and
• a main cationic flocculation agent in a quantity lying in the range 1% to 5% by dry
weight relative to the total dry weight of the fibers.

Documents

Name Date
4104-kolnp-2009-translated copy of priority document.pdf 2011-10-08
4104-KOLNP-2009-PA.pdf 2011-10-08
4104-kolnp-2009-specification.pdf 2011-10-08
4104-kolnp-2009-pct request form.pdf 2011-10-08
4104-kolnp-2009-form 5.pdf 2011-10-08
4104-kolnp-2009-form 3.pdf 2011-10-08
4104-kolnp-2009-form 2.pdf 2011-10-08
4104-kolnp-2009-international search report.pdf 2011-10-08
4104-KOLNP-2009-FORM 18.pdf 2011-10-08
4104-kolnp-2009-form 1.pdf 2011-10-08
4104-kolnp-2009-international publication.pdf 2011-10-08
4104-kolnp-2009-description (complete).pdf 2011-10-08
4104-kolnp-2009-correspondence.pdf 2011-10-08
4104-KOLNP-2009-CORRESPONDENCE-1.1.pdf 2011-10-08
4104-kolnp-2009-abstract.pdf 2011-10-08
4104-KOLNP-2009-Correspondence-110515.pdf 2015-08-27
4104-KOLNP-2009-(04-05-2016)-CORRESPONDENCE.pdf 2016-05-04
4104-kolnp-2009-claims.pdf 2011-10-08
4104-KOLNP-2009-FER.pdf 2016-11-28
4104-KOLNP-2009-(09-03-2017)-DRDO-PERMISSION.pdf 2017-03-09
Petition Under Rule 137 [25-05-2017(online)].pdf 2017-05-25
Examination Report Reply Recieved [25-05-2017(online)].pdf 2017-05-25
4104-KOLNP-2009-HearingNoticeLetter.pdf 2017-06-14
Claims [25-05-2017(online)].pdf 2017-05-25
4104-KOLNP-2009-(03-07-2017)-DAE-PERMISSION.pdf 2017-07-03
4104-KOLNP-2009-ExtendedHearingNoticeLetter_26Jul2017.pdf 2017-07-05
HEARING ADJOURNMENT [03-07-2017(online)].pdf 2017-07-03
4104-KOLNP-2009-Response to office action (Mandatory) [25-08-2017(online)].pdf 2017-08-25
4104-KOLNP-2009-Written submissions and relevant documents (MANDATORY) [04-08-2017(online)].pdf 2017-08-04
4104-KOLNP-2009-IntimationOfGrant14-09-2017.pdf 2017-09-14
4104-KOLNP-2009-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [15-03-2018(online)].pdf 2018-03-15
Other Document [25-05-2017(online)].pdf 2017-05-25
4104-KOLNP-2009-PROOF OF ALTERATION [09-01-2018(online)].pdf 2018-01-09
4104-KOLNP-2009-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [07-02-2019(online)].pdf 2019-02-07
4104-KOLNP-2009-PatentCertificate14-09-2017.pdf 2017-09-14
4104-KOLNP-2009-POWER OF AUTHORITY [20-08-2019(online)].pdf 2019-08-20
4104-KOLNP-2009-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [29-02-2020(online)].pdf 2020-02-29
4104-KOLNP-2009-POWER OF AUTHORITY [20-08-2019(online)]-1.pdf 2019-08-20
4104-KOLNP-2009-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [22-09-2021(online)].pdf 2021-09-22
4104-KOLNP-2009-FORM-16 [20-08-2019(online)]-1.pdf 2019-08-20
4104-KOLNP-2009-FORM-26 [23-12-2020(online)].pdf 2020-12-23
4104-KOLNP-2009-FORM-16 [20-08-2019(online)].pdf 2019-08-20
4104-KOLNP-2009-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [22-09-2021(online)].pdf 2021-09-22
4104-kolnp-2009-specification.pdf 2011-10-08
4104-kolnp-2009-translated copy of priority document.pdf 2011-10-08
4104-kolnp-2009-form 2.pdf 2011-10-08
4104-KOLNP-2009-PA.pdf 2011-10-08
4104-kolnp-2009-international publication.pdf 2011-10-08
4104-KOLNP-2009-Correspondence-110515.pdf 2015-08-27
4104-kolnp-2009-form 1.pdf 2011-10-08
4104-kolnp-2009-form 5.pdf 2011-10-08
4104-KOLNP-2009-(09-03-2017)-DRDO-PERMISSION.pdf 2017-03-09
4104-kolnp-2009-pct request form.pdf 2011-10-08
4104-kolnp-2009-form 3.pdf 2011-10-08
4104-kolnp-2009-international search report.pdf 2011-10-08
4104-kolnp-2009-claims.pdf 2011-10-08
4104-KOLNP-2009-CORRESPONDENCE-1.1.pdf 2011-10-08
4104-kolnp-2009-correspondence.pdf 2011-10-08
4104-KOLNP-2009-FER.pdf 2016-11-28
4104-kolnp-2009-abstract.pdf 2011-10-08
4104-kolnp-2009-description (complete).pdf 2011-10-08
4104-KOLNP-2009-(04-05-2016)-CORRESPONDENCE.pdf 2016-05-04
HEARING ADJOURNMENT [03-07-2017(online)].pdf 2017-07-03
Petition Under Rule 137 [25-05-2017(online)].pdf 2017-05-25
Examination Report Reply Recieved [25-05-2017(online)].pdf 2017-05-25
4104-KOLNP-2009-ExtendedHearingNoticeLetter_26Jul2017.pdf 2017-07-05
4104-KOLNP-2009-HearingNoticeLetter.pdf 2017-06-14
Claims [25-05-2017(online)].pdf 2017-05-25
4104-KOLNP-2009-Response to office action (Mandatory) [25-08-2017(online)].pdf 2017-08-25
4104-KOLNP-2009-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [15-03-2018(online)].pdf 2018-03-15
4104-KOLNP-2009-IntimationOfGrant14-09-2017.pdf 2017-09-14
4104-KOLNP-2009-PROOF OF ALTERATION [09-01-2018(online)].pdf 2018-01-09
4104-KOLNP-2009-(03-07-2017)-DAE-PERMISSION.pdf 2017-07-03
4104-KOLNP-2009-PatentCertificate14-09-2017.pdf 2017-09-14
4104-KOLNP-2009-Written submissions and relevant documents (MANDATORY) [04-08-2017(online)].pdf 2017-08-04
4104-KOLNP-2009-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [07-02-2019(online)].pdf 2019-02-07
4104-KOLNP-2009-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [07-09-2022(online)].pdf 2022-09-07
4104-KOLNP-2009-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [30-09-2022(online)].pdf 2022-09-30
4104-KOLNP-2009-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [29-02-2020(online)].pdf 2020-02-29
4104-KOLNP-2009-FORM-16 [20-08-2019(online)].pdf 2019-08-20
4104-KOLNP-2009-FORM-16 [20-08-2019(online)]-1.pdf 2019-08-20
4104-KOLNP-2009-POWER OF AUTHORITY [20-08-2019(online)]-1.pdf 2019-08-20
4104-KOLNP-2009-FORM-26 [23-12-2020(online)].pdf 2020-12-23
4104-KOLNP-2009-POWER OF AUTHORITY [20-08-2019(online)].pdf 2019-08-20
Other Document [25-05-2017(online)].pdf 2017-05-25
4104-KOLNP-2009-FORM 18.pdf 2011-10-08

Orders

Applicant Section Controller Decision Date URL