Navigation
Updated 3 months
Why Not
DocumentsTrademark Information
| Application ID | 2556447 |
| Status | Abandoned |
| Date of Application | 28 June 2013 |
| Class(es) | 35 |
| Type | Device |
| Registration State | Karnataka |
| Country | India |
| Details | [CLASS : 35] ADVERTISING, BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, OFFICE FUNCTIONS ALL RELATING TO INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES. |
Image (DEVICE)
Proprietor
Ashok Yaraganal SitaramAttorney
Krishna & Saurastri AssociatesFrequently Asked Questions
Date on which the trademark application was filed with TMO?
Why not was applied on 28 June 2013.
Who is the trademark proprietor?
Trademark application was filed by Ashok Yaraganal Sitaram.
Trademark application is filed under which trademark class?
Trademark application has been filed under following classes.
35
Trademark application is at what stage of trademark process?
As per IP India, trademark application is on the following stage:
Abandoned.
What is the Listed Application ID of the Trademark?
Listed application Id of Why not is 2556447.
Who filed the trademark on behalf of the proprietor?
Trademark attorney of the Why not is Krishna & Saurastri Associates.
Is the Trademark word, color or device mark?
Why not is a DEVICE as per IP India data.